list MYOPTIONS deps along with option deps

[zlin]

Maybe by splitting that out of pkg_pretend for now or by running pretends for packages that aren't masked

[ciaranm]

I don't think I get what this is after. How's it different from ticket:956?

[zlin]

This is just about showing all option requirements along with option deps even in cases where pretend don't currently get run. If foo[bar] depends upon bar[baz] and foo[baz] you currently first get an error about bar needing to be reconfigured. Then after you've resolved that you get an error about foo[bar] requiring foo[baz].

[ciaranm]

Hrm, this is related to ticket:1066.

The pkg_bad_options thing is done as part of PretendAction?. So we'd need some way of running just the "bad options" part of PretendAction?. However, it's rather fiddly, because there might be changed choices in action, so we'd have to redo the MYOPTIONS checking to do it with changes rather than upon the basic flags.

[ciaranm]

...and then we'd need a way of running pkg_bad_options such that things like optionq would work on the reconfigured values too.

This is starting to look very very messy.